“Obama who actually is a moderate-liberal” says Gary
Many assumed, possible voters today do not know any history from the pre-Internet age (before 1994). The Republican candidates’ vision is about how they will govern as Ronald Reagan did over twenty years ago. Twenty years ago has been mostly forgotten by too many of us. If one tells today’s generaion of voters one will govern as Reagan did, one might as well say as Washington did. [Note: Washington was the first President.]
For too many ‘voters’ the sixty years of corrupt Democrat rule can not be established except by old-fashioned footnotes. Those historical facts are unsearchable on the Internet. At best, they are mentioned on web logs but such web sites are considered opinions, discounted as negativsm. On the Internet the Republican not Democrats’ corruption in power will be found archived. Who is going to leave their personal computer-terminal in order to go to a library to read a history book or any book? How can we explain the ceaselessly, unbounded control of the Chicago Democrat Machine on America’s third city to this Internet age? Over at Rightwingsparkle weblog:
I was critized as being hyperbolic for accusing Obama of being a radical leftist.
“I hold those RINOs in Illinois responsible, who were cowards to run against Obama in ‘0[2] but invites Keyes into their State so none of them had to run [but] they refused to fund Keyes. If we get President Obama, [this] radical leftist Obama and his Chicago Machine controls Washington for 4 to 8 years it is the Illinois Republicans fault. If they had funded Keyes, Obama wouldn’t be a candidate today.”
Erik of VA replied, “Obama is a “radical leftist”? That sounds like a bit of hyperbole. I’ve studied my guy fairly closely and I don’t see anything that crazy in his past. Where do you get this from? I don’t want us to elect a radical ANYthing, so if I’m wrong about it, I’d like to know now before the state of VA votes. Regarding the machine, wasn’t that Daly’s machine? How did Obama become part of that?”
In this political and cultural atmosphere, our Republican candidates can not just say they will do as Ronald Reagan had done. We can not shout: Ronald Reagan Ronald Reagan . . . . In the 1960s, the shout was for Bob Taft Bob Taft . . . . Neither of those two good Republicans have a LIVE Internet presence. Our candidates need not to tell America that they will be the next mythical Ronald Reagan; They must be Ronald Reagan! If our candidates speak and act as Reagan instead of being poor copies of him, then in nine years we will heard our 2016 candidates telling us how, for examples, they are the next Fred Thompson (or Duncan Hunter)! We need vision of why America is great, why Americans are great. How when the government stands back — Americans roll up their sleeves and they create a better tomorrow. The Shining city on a hill is not a government work-project.
