REFLECTIONS

Dreyfus Never Rests

BurkeanMama — Wed, 09 Nov 2011 17:32:16 +0000

So the Prime Minister of France hates the Prime Minister of Israel http://pjmedia.com/spengler/2011/11/08/what-does-sarkozy-mean-by-the-term-liar/ If you’re shocked you must be new here. French hatred of the Jewish people is a very old story. The delicious irony of course is that it is French hatred of the Jewish people that created the Zionist movement in the first place. http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Dreyfus_Affair

If it weren’t for mindless French bigotry the State of Israel might not exist for France to constantly undermine. So Merci stinking bigots.

Can Liberals Hear Themselves Part Infinite

BurkeanMama — Fri, 28 Oct 2011 23:19:31 +0000

PJTV has video of some left wing racists saying that “conservatives like Cain because he knows his place.” Meaning he is an Uncle Tom.

http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2011/10/28/dem-wit-gop-likes-cain-because-hes-a-black-man-who-knows-his-place/

As always The biggest problem with the liberals ravings is reality. Mr. Cain’s place is CEO of a nationwide business. Which, if it means what the libereral says, instead of the racist idea the liberal is claiming, means that conservatives like black men we can call boss.

Who’s the racist here?

Can Liberals Hear Themselves

BurkeanMama — Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:25:45 +0000

Instapundit linked to a story about the green jobs boondogle in Newsweek http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2011/10/16/obama-s-green-energy-agenda-flop.html The article does it’s cheery liberal best to call the boondoggle a worthy experiement. But the best part is the closting quote by my very own Senator Barbara brainless Boxer

“There’s always a risk when you fund innovation, but if we abandoned going to the moon when a spacecraft exploded … where would we be today?”

She has an excellent point. If the government had given up after Apollo 1, today we would have no moon base, no permanent space station and in fact no manned space program at all. Now wouldn’t that be terrible?

Everytime you think liberal arguments can’t get stupider; they find a way.

But That’s Why I Like Cain

BurkeanMama — Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:25:04 +0000

Over at National Review Online they printed up George Will’s comments on Herman Cain

George Will on Cain: ‘He’s Sort of Strolling for President’

By NRO Staff

Posted on October 16, 2011 6:41 P

“We’re having a kind of Andy Warhol primary where everyone is leader for 15 minutes. And it’s Cain’s turn today. But it’s not clear that Cain has staying power. He’s not running for president; he’s sort of strolling for president without an infrastructure. It’s pretty and cute and nice, but whether that works, we can be doubtful.” — George F. Will, speaking on ABC’s This Week

But see that’s why I like Herman Cain. Mr. Cain knows he is running for President, not the Messiah. Cain is running a political campaign not a religious revival. He has a common sense and a sense of perspective I find greatly refreshing in a Presidential candidate. He doesn’t think he can make “lame beggars walk” or turn back the seas; he thinks he knows how to balance a budget. I would so settle for that right now.

We don’t need the “electable” candidate

Brer Tiger — Thu, 13 Oct 2011 08:11:47 +0000

I hate people telling us that we must vote for the one who is the most “electable” candidate. Because, when it comes to Republicans, “electable” is code for “most like a Democrat”. They think that only a democrat, or one who is like a democrat can get elected. I am TIRED of actual conservative candidates being tossed by the wayside in favor of the “most electable” candidate … who then proceeds to demonstrate that he is not electable after all. Last time around, we lost Duncan Hunter to this kind of thinking.

If we are going to lose, let’s lose by our principles. But — and here is the thing — the people who are proclaiming to us which candidate is “electable” are doing one of two things. They are either playing upon our fears of losing the election and telling us that THEIR candidate is the only one who is “electable”. Or worse, they are actually planning for defeat by thinking in terms of ”let’s pick someone who is most like the other party”.

They are WRONG. The American People would be more than willing to vote for someone with principles. It’s when they are offered a choice between “Democrat” and “Democrat Lite” that they decide to go for the real Democrat. I mean, if you are going to have a Democrat, why not pick the Real Thing, right?

Herman Cain is the most unabashedly conservative candidate we have. The Florida Straw Poll picked him even when the pundits weren’t even MENTIONING him after the debates. He is the man we need for the upcoming election, and not just as a token VP on the ticket. He needs to be the top of the ticket. And the “electable” candidate, Romney? Pfeh. A Republican who is a success in a Blue state. Who brought Obamacare to his state before it was brought to the rest of the country. Pfeh again. Romney is “electable”. We need someone who can LEAD.